News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by TheCoelacanth on Sunday April 25, 2021 @07:36PM (#26937777)
But passenger road traffic is only 7%. The rest is freight which requires a completely different solution.

There is no low hanging fruit. We need to address every sector. No individual solution is going to cut more than a few percent of total carbon emissions.

Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by iancmceachern on Monday April 26, 2021 @03:02AM (#26940022)
24% industrial use is in my mind.

A buddy of mine worked for a startup a few years ago that promised to go into large plants and do some trickery with the harmonic losses with the very large AC motors in a lot of the big equipment. Apparently there is a lot of losses in such things. They would install equipment to improve the situation in exchange for a portion of the energy savings over time, which was considerable.

Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by TheCoelacanth on Monday April 26, 2021 @10:08AM (#26942633)
Except that also breaks down into 7% iron/steel, 3.6% chemical and oil, 1% food and tobacco and many other small categories.

Is the same solution that cuts down on carbon emissions in making steel going to cut emissions when making fertilizer?

Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by iancmceachern on Wednesday April 28, 2021 @01:24PM (#26971878)
Yes, because all those plants have big AC motors driving the machinery. Any place where there is a big AC motor can benefit from this. That means most of the applications you can think of.