Re:“No Defense of the Indefensible”: L.A. Judge Makes Landma...
by crooked-v on Sunday April 25, 2021 @06:39PM
(#26937391)
> direct physical harm by individual officers
No, it's not. Your own links directly contradict that; see, for example, the second paper and page 10 (not an officer of the law, not direct physical harm) and page 18 (officers of the law but no direct harm of any kind).
No, it's not. Your own links directly contradict that; see, for example, the second paper and page 10 (not an officer of the law, not direct physical harm) and page 18 (officers of the law but no direct harm of any kind).