Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by chrisco255 on Sunday April 25, 2021 @10:50PM
(#26938766)
Problem with local telecoms is that too often, there is a local monopoly. The problem with the government is its always in a de facto monopoly position. It has little incentive to change except during a voting cycle turnover, and at most voters can focus on a handful of issues at a time.
Funny enough, it seems like SpaceX has the solution for this and it's rolling out as we speak: https://www.starlink.com/ . Space-based internet that actually works and is actually fast is a game-changer.
Let's see how the telecoms respond to competitive pressure. If anyone can get 100Mbps within a year, I'm willing to bet Gigabit fiber/cable will be available nearly everywhere soon.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by throwawayboise on Sunday April 25, 2021 @03:18PM
(#26935681)
> effective oversight mechanism
Hard to do when the people who really understand broadband networking are working for ATT, Comcast, and Verizon and not for the government.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by adventured on Sunday April 25, 2021 @05:05PM
(#26936677)
The US telecom companies were not given something like a hundred billion dollars. They were never paid those sums and they were also not given tax breaks in that amount either. That's one of the great forever repeating myths on HN (it's useful as a propaganda item, thus the repeating). There is even an HN member that has been repeatedly correcting the myth for years, here you go:
The key thing is not the sector but whether there’s an effective oversight mechanism. It’s a lot more productive to focus on those feedback loops than trying to assume any sector comes in exactly one universal quality level.