Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by schoen on Sunday April 25, 2021 @02:04PM
(#26934950)
It's strange to see the contrast between how relatively large a share of transportation Amtrak has in the Northeast Corridor compared to elsewhere in the country. I've heard this ascribed to population density, but it doesn't seem like trains are as popular in places like Texas or Southern California.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by colinmhayes on Sunday April 25, 2021 @05:42PM
(#26936961)
Huge advantage of amtrak is that the stations are in prime locations. In the northeast that's a huge advantage as going from train to destination might be a 15 minute walk. Meanwhile airport to destination could be an hour drive. Sunbelt cities have no density, so the trains location isn't as valuable.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by blabitty on Sunday April 25, 2021 @02:28PM
(#26935212)
Development and land use patterns are way different in the Sunbelt. There are lines that go through most downtowns but most of the people live far from the stations. The passenger trains also share lines with freight and freight is prioritized, a trip from Austin to Dallas by Amtrak takes 6 hours but can be driven in 3 or so.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by ghaff on Sunday April 25, 2021 @03:20PM
(#26935693)
Lots of people in the Northeast don't live in downtowns either. One big difference if that, if you're taking a trip to one of the big cities, you often don't need or even want a car when you get there. On the other hand, if you can drive somewhere in 4-5 hours, taking a train and then having to rent a car when you arrive seems a lot less attractive.