Re:Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches,...
by jb775 on Saturday April 24, 2021 @03:34AM
(#26923040)
IMO you grossly overestimate the amount humans know about things.
Science is basically a stream of updated realizations that the previous "known" things were actually wrong.
Re:Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches,...
by rcxdude on Saturday April 24, 2021 @05:12AM
(#26923499)
and you vastly underestimate it
Re:Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches,...
by kingsuper20 on Saturday April 24, 2021 @02:23PM
(#26927142)
I underestimate it and overestimate it.
Excuse me, I'm off to build a battery out of a bank of leaf springs.
Re:Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches,...
by f6v on Saturday April 24, 2021 @11:57AM
(#26925867)
> We understand most things about it
In a classical mechanics sense - yes. But the waves were detected just couple years ago.
Re:Gravity batteries try to beat chemical ones with winches,...
by nl on Sunday April 25, 2021 @12:26AM
(#26930344)
It's true we only recently have been able to built equipment sensitive enough to measure them.
However, they were predicted in 1916 as part of Einstein's Relativity work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave
We understand most things about it
> It's a perpetual energy source right in front of us,
No it's not. It's a good way to store energy but in no way is a source.
> and can barely offer a basic explanation as to what powers it
It's not something that has power. It's a consequence of entropy.
> It even impacts time itself
You sound surprised by this? Given relativity it would be more surprising if it didn't.