News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google code?. Parent comment

Re:Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google c... by make3 on Friday April 23, 2021 @05:57PM (#26919682)
The title is not clickbait, the reason the Warhol Foundation is using is what I think the parent is arguing is "clickbait".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google c... by hn_throwaway_99 on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:02PM (#26919730)
That does not make any sense for any reasonable definition of clickbait.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google c... by gumby on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:14PM (#26919823)
I understand that the WF is incorrectly using the Java API decision (and tying it to media's favorite punching bag by citing google) but the Hollywood Reporter didn't have to go along -- they wrote a perfectly good article that didn't need that title.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google c... by lupire on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:57PM (#26920222)
HR is reporting accurately. The answer to the question is likely No.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Does Andy Warhol get same copyright treatment as Google c... by gumby on Friday April 23, 2021 @06:31PM (#26919995)
I don't know why your comment was downvoted (I tried to rescue it) as you were responding to confusion due to my poorly written comment.

I explained down thread what I had meant to say.

[ Parent | on HN ]