Re:Winklevoss twins end legal row with Facebook
by danssig on Friday June 24, 2011 @03:57AM
(#2691433)
>They don't get to own 50% of another company because their company was delayed by a few months.
I think they should get Mark's shares. It's not that their company was delayed a few months, it's that the founder of another company came in and sabotaged their company long enough to gain critical mass. In fact, I'm surprised what Mark's did isn't illegal.
I think they should get Mark's shares. It's not that their company was delayed a few months, it's that the founder of another company came in and sabotaged their company long enough to gain critical mass. In fact, I'm surprised what Mark's did isn't illegal.