Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”
by rualca on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @07:46PM
(#26896832)
> Now they appear to be doing it again. It’s a different PHD student with the same advisor as last time.
I'd hate to be the PhD student that wastes away half a dozen years of his/her life writing a document on how to sneak buggy code through a code review.
More than being pointless and boring, it's a total CV black hole. It's the worst of both worlds: zero professional experience to show for, and zero academic portfolio to show for.
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”
by db48x on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @08:44PM
(#26897290)
True. They would be better off competing in the Underhanded C Contest (http://www.underhanded-c.org/).
This time two reviewers noticed that the patch was useless, and then Greg stepped in (three weeks later) saying that this was a repetition of the same bad behavior from the first study. This got a response from the author of the patch, who said that this and other statements were “wild accusations that are bordering on slander”.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah...