Re:Exploiting vulnerabilities in Cellebrite UFED and Physica...
by franga2000 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @05:29PM
(#26895684)
Damn, a chain of custody where the thing in evidence is also part of not only its own chain but also those of other evidence acquired afterwards? I can't imagine what kind of case law exists around that, but I'm sure it's hilarious!
Re:Exploiting vulnerabilities in Cellebrite UFED and Physica...
by cosmie on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @08:49PM
(#26897321)
> also those of other evidence acquired afterwards
And prior extracts on the device.
Re:Exploiting vulnerabilities in Cellebrite UFED and Physica...
by elliekelly on Thursday April 22, 2021 @11:12AM
(#26903640)
Which is what I don't really understand - it seems like Cellebrite could spin this in their favor so law enforcement would need to purchase a new kit for each device?
They are basically putting the threat out that if you use Cellebrite on Signal in the future, you might not get the data you expect, and at worst, it may corrupt the report/evidence.
This also brings into question the chain of custody, as an untrusted device being imaged can alter reports of unrelated devices.