“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose”

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by protomyth on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @04:29PM (#26895036)

This study does not care about the reviewers, it cares about the process. For example, you can certainly improve the process without replacing any reviewers. It is just blatantly false to claim the process is all about humans.

This was all about the reaction of humans. They sent in text with a deceptive description and tried to get a positive answer even though the text was not wholly what was described. It was a psych study in an uncontrolled environment with people who did not know they were participating in a study.

How they thought this was acceptable with their own institutions Participant's Bill of Rights https://research.umn.edu/units/hrpp/research-participants/pa... is a true mystery.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by temp8964 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @04:45PM (#26895219)

No. This is not all about the reaction of humans. This is not a psych study. I have explained this clearly in previous comments. If you believe the process of doing something is all about humans, I have nothing to add.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by protomyth on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @06:43PM (#26896343)

I'm not the only one https://mobile.twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1384871385...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by temp8964 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @06:50PM (#26896394)

How does this link have anything to do with my comments?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by protomyth on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @07:13PM (#26896562)

It provides details of why it was a human experiment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by temp8964 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @08:13PM (#26897052)

Which tweet?

[ Parent | on HN ]