Re:On the bare necessity of psychological safety
by thanhhaimai on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @06:22PM
(#26896182)
> Typically it's the people from the hard-to-get-into colleges, or with years of company tenure, or with specialized knowledge causing the psychological safety issues.
This is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.
Re:On the bare necessity of psychological safety
by lmm on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @08:33PM
(#26897218)
How so? It seems common-sense that people in a less secure position would be more careful of others' feelings, and so issues would likely come from those in a more secure position.
Re:On the bare necessity of psychological safety
by maybelsyrup on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @07:58PM
(#26896946)
What's extraordinary about the claim?
Re:On the bare necessity of psychological safety
by HarryHirsch on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @07:32PM
(#26896714)
Smith College?
Maybe 2005 Google, but not anymore. A good bachelors degree or enough YoE at most companies gets you the interview, and then the interview result usually does the rest. Those are the "line engineers" that move on to other faangs or unicorns when psychological safety becomes an issue.
Typically it's the people from the hard-to-get-into colleges, or with years of company tenure, or with specialized knowledge causing the psychological safety issues.