Re:US owners find greed doesn't play well in European soccer
by bmsleight_ on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @03:18PM
(#26894210)
>How can true fans support Chelsea when the money from Abramovich change the dimension,
Man City were getting 30,000 fans attending in the third tier. Sunderland gets 30,000 fans attending in the third tier.
Re:US owners find greed doesn't play well in European soccer
by borroka on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @05:56PM
(#26895950)
Minor characters on the European football stage with a good local following. Schalke04 in Germany, Roma, Lazio, Fiorentina (when in B, Lazio and Fiorentina were making 30k+ each Sunday) in Italy, ManCity in England. Before the oil money, at first approximation nobody outside of England knew about ManCity (or Sunderland...). My point is that teams with large local followings had a certain "spirit" (working-class City fans against the less working-class United fans, working-class Torino fans against more posh Juve fans) and tradition that has been razed to the ground by the arrival of owners who have yes a ton of money, but nothing in terms of the local culture. If I were an old-time City fan, I would not be able to support a team that has nothing to do with what the team historically represented, has nothing is terms of local property, and could play in Manchester or in London or in Newcastle and it would be exactly the same.
Re:US owners find greed doesn't play well in European soccer
by bmsleight_ on Thursday April 22, 2021 @03:42AM
(#26899924)
I understand your point better now - thanks.
This fans reaction to the proposed ESL is ridiculous. Football is of and for the fans? How laughable. Players making millions and millions, oil money and money from suspicious financing changing teams from minor characters in the national stage to top teams (see Chelsea, ManCity, PSG). How can true fans support Chelsea when the money from Abramovich change the dimension, the spirit of the team? Or Manchester City, with working-class fans that are now supporting a team that in one week is spending more than an Onassis in a year?
My football, the "romantic" football, ended in the 80s. Certainly a time in which players were already paid handsomely, but also a time in which you could see players play for the "shirt", in which teams had an identifiable "culture" and "spirit" that was shared among players and fans. A sport, not just a pastime. I cannot stand watching a game now.