News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by mort96 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @09:39AM (#26889522)
It's also not a pen test. Pen testing is explicitly authorized, where you play the role as an attacker, with consent from your victim, in order to report security issues to your victim. This is just straight-up malicious behavior, where the "researchers" play the role as an attacker, without consent from their victim, for personal gain (in this case, publishing a paper).
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by NotEvil on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @09:50AM (#26889658)
Because of the nature of the research an argument can be made that it was like a bug bounty (not defending them just putting my argument) but they should have come clean when the patched was merged and told the community about the research or at least submitted the right patch.

Intentionally having bugs in kernel only you know about is very bad.

Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by opnitro on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @10:29AM (#26890112)
The primary difference being the organization being tested explicitly sets up a bug bounty with terms, as opposed to this.
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by unanswered on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @04:08PM (#26894766)
I'll take People Who Don't Understand Consent for $400, Alex.
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by shkkmo on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @04:22PM (#26894927)
This is the rare HN joke that not only is hilarious, but susinctly makes the core point that is being disagreed about clear
Re:“They introduce kernel bugs on purpose” by salawat on Friday April 23, 2021 @09:23AM (#26914488)
This is a disturbingly frequent thing occurrence here.