Re:Understanding Indirect Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing
by rzw2 on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @12:44PM
(#26877106)
The microsoft kinect does 3 frequency measurements to get the higher distance precision of higher modulation frequencies and to extend the maximum distance so the phase wrapping (aliasing) can be solved.
Based on some Microsoft patent filings and other research papers I wrote a short article on possible phase unwrapping methods on iToF sensors, https://medium.com/chronoptics-time-of-flight/phase-wrapping...
Re:Understanding Indirect Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing
by jcims on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @02:49PM
(#26879346)
Fantastic article!!! They definitely need your animations, it's way more intuitive.
Re:Understanding Indirect Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing
by rzw2 on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @07:09PM
(#26883188)
Thanks, got any references to how the surveying equipment de-aliasing method worked?
Re:Understanding Indirect Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing
by jcims on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @08:12PM
(#26883738)
I don’t unfortunately. I was there doing an information security assessment and the guy I was working with was one of the product engineers. When I wrapped my work we spent another hour or two just talking about their products and how they worked.
Re:Understanding Indirect Time-of-Flight Depth Sensing
by opwieurposiu on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @10:20AM
(#26875027)
The kinect does do the "chirp", but this detail is omitted from TFA.
If these are 90 degrees out of phase I don't know how they eliminate that possibility without doing something similar. (e.g. imagine the modulation is at 30MHz and your measurement interval is 10m, how would you differentiate between 20.034m and 30.034m?