Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by rcMgD2BwE72F on Monday April 19, 2021 @03:59AM
(#26860136)
How does it differ from https://wallabag.org?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by coffeeri on Monday April 19, 2021 @05:15AM
(#26860618)
It is quiet convenient to combine the two. You are able to export your wallabag list via RSS and import it on a schedule in archivebox.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by unicornporn on Monday April 19, 2021 @08:12AM
(#26861855)
https://www.linkace.org/
Just a heads-up. Found that a while ago and much prefer it over wallabag.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by Kovah on Monday April 19, 2021 @11:52AM
(#26864156)
Thanks for sharing LinkAce! Maintainer here. If you or others have any questions, feel free to ask.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by pseudalopex on Monday April 19, 2021 @01:48PM
(#26865836)
What makes it better?
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by Kovah on Monday April 19, 2021 @04:24PM
(#26867553)
I think it's primarily personal preference of features and how things are stored and presented. While Wallabag is more a Pocket/Read It Later alternative, LinkAce does not save the website itself, but a reference to it including the taxonomy you assign to it. It is intended to be a long-term bookmark archive, but without handling all the website archiving on its own.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by hlasdjlfhalwjk on Monday April 19, 2021 @04:46AM
(#26860380)
Wallabag only stores links. ArchiveBox archives a snapshot of the actual content of a page at a specific point in time.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by ernesth on Monday April 19, 2021 @08:37AM
(#26862032)
Wallabag extracts the content and stores it. Not just the links.
Re:ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving
by hlasdjlfhalwjk on Monday April 26, 2021 @10:37AM
(#26942955)
Didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying.