News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proposal: Treat FLoC as a security concern by slver on Sunday April 18, 2021 @06:29PM (#26857109)
If you have figured out a way to eliminate tracking, be my guest. Mozilla would like to know, Apple would like to know. Until then FLoC attracts attention because it's new, yes, this explains our reaction. It's still an irrational reaction.

Also what's this "predatory targeting of unsophisticated consumers" about? You don't need targeting for this. Heck you don't need anything for this. The way it's usually carried out is you hack some sites and redirect them to you landing page about "this one magic trick to riches, banks hate her".

Re:Proposal: Treat FLoC as a security concern by jffry on Sunday April 18, 2021 @10:11PM (#26858537)
Mozilla at least has done plenty of things to reduce the effectiveness and scope of tracking on the web.

Just because we can't create an ironclad solution doesn't mean that there isn't real value in reducing the usable surface area for profiling and tracking users across the web.

FLoC is an additional means of tracking users that is presently being pushed by a giant corporation who controls a significant web browser, of course anybody who is pro-user-privacy would rail against its rollout. It's ridiculous to call that an irrational reaction.

Re:Proposal: Treat FLoC as a security concern by om2 on Monday April 19, 2021 @02:45AM (#26859743)
Apple is doing just fine on greatly reducing tracking, and we don’t think FLoC or anything much like it is necessary. Safari already blocks 3P cookies by default and has done so for a year.
Re:Proposal: Treat FLoC as a security concern by salawat on Sunday April 18, 2021 @07:06PM (#26857392)
So you're the one who keeps doing that, or is it a group thing?

Just curious. It undoubtedly works, but I've always wondered why it's so pervasive.

Re:Proposal: Treat FLoC as a security concern by slver on Monday April 19, 2021 @12:44AM (#26859188)
Congratulations, you win a free iPhone.