Re:Thanks for the Bonus, I Quit
by im3w1l on Saturday April 17, 2021 @09:18PM
(#26848959)
This is the curse of 95% reliability. People will rely on it even though they shouldn't. It's better if it's only like 66% reliable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
We know how to deal with this in the technical domain - we break things on purpose in a controlled way so that people don't rely on an SLO that is there by mere chance.
Maybe companies should do "bonus tolerance breaks" for the same purpose.
Re:Thanks for the Bonus, I Quit
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Sunday April 18, 2021 @03:16PM
(#26855405)
The right way implement this is to tie a sizable chunk of the quarterly bonus to an ambitious company-wide goal that fails 30% of the time. If the company is hitting the bonusable goal 95% of the time, the bar is probably too low.
Re:Thanks for the Bonus, I Quit
by emodendroket on Sunday April 18, 2021 @11:47AM
(#26853453)
Considering typical turnover that's not possible unless you pay out the bonuses on a much more frequent than annual schedule.