News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What I Wish I Knew About U2F and Other Hardware MFA Proto... by TacticalCoder on Saturday April 17, 2021 @09:17AM (#26844019)
> If I read that right, some keys rather than having a hardcoded unique seed, will let you set your own.

Set your own or generate one for you, using an hardware CSPRNG, and then let you write it down in a convenient way (24 words out of a dictionary of 2048 words, so 264 bits: 256 bits of entropy plus 8 bits of checksum. Heck, you can use 12 or 18 words too. I think the (BIP39 / BIP44) standard even allows for 15 words but Ledger does only support lists of 12/18 and 24 words although don't quote me on that).

> Which implies you can have multiple functionally-identical backup keys locked up securely somewhere.

I don't even bother having multiple devices ready to use. I simply store the seed (once again: as a list of 12/18 or 24 words) on a sheet of paper and I store this in vaults/safes.

> Anyone know which keys support this (aside from the mentioned Nano S and Trezor)? What's the magic keyword to look for in specs?

I've got a Ledger Nano S only for this. It's really a nice little device. I don't work for Ledger btw! They're a bit pricey but, indeed, the anxiety of getting locked out of your account or having through crazy procedures goes away.

It's a pricey little device but not that crazy expensive: about 60 USD I think.

> What's the magic keyword to look for in specs?

I don't know but the U2F "nano app" does work with Google and other sites and I know that Ledger is working on the more recent Webauthn support.

There are no comments on this comment yet.