Do you actually disagree with that statement? If the essence of the argument doesn't change, why argue with numbers in the first place?
The first half of the statement is also not obviously true to me, given the large amount of wage income that is federally marginally taxed at 22 or 24% and the large amount of long-term capital gains that are taxed at 23.8%.
Is some wage income taxed higher than some investment income? Obviously, yes. Is that done specifically to disincentivize work? I don’t think so. Are long-term capital gains and qualified dividends taxed lower in order to incentivize long-term investing? I think so. Do we conclude from that that politicians hate workers more than investors? Exploring that requires looking at facts not yet in evidence here.
OMG. I was paraphrasing YOUR COMMENT! Precisely because it's irrefutable nonsense.
[And the fact that you came back after nine hours to edit your comment to make it look like you had more to say is just... <chef's kiss>]
Why does that change the analysis?