News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by swyx on Friday April 16, 2021 @11:17AM (#26834913)
what are your thoughts on the Blue Yeti? I dont really like it but it seems SUPER popular...
Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by eropple on Friday April 16, 2021 @11:49AM (#26835393)
The Yeti is popular because it's a USB microphone and it got in early. It's not a bad microphone (at all, somebody telling you it is wants to sell you something) but it's generally misapplied in most settings where it finds itself.

For simple spoken-word stuff like conferences or streams or whatever, something like a Samson Q2U or an AT2005USB/ATR2100 are less sensitive to unwanted noise and easier for an untrained user to get a good sound out of, while moving into the XLR space gets you access to better dynamic microphones and also some pretty reasonably priced condensers that do quite well (though there's some up-front investment in the audio hardware, of course).

Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by hajile on Friday April 16, 2021 @12:06PM (#26835641)
I own a yeti (and a yeti pro) among quite a few other mics.

It's actively bad for most people for one reason: capacitive mics pick up everything.

If your room isn't soundproofed, it will be very hard to keep noise out of your recording. Dynamic mics are much less sensitive in this regard.

I would instead recommend a Samson 2Qu or Audio Technica ATR2100-USB on the low end ($70-100) or the Shure MV7 ($250) on the high end for plug-n-play mics.

If you want to move into a cheap audio interface (eg, Focusrite Scarlett Solo + cloudlifter), I'd recommend either the Shure SM7b or the ElectroVoice re20 on the higher end and the Shure sm57 on the cheaper end (good enough for the president to use for the last 40-ish years).

Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by CharlesW on Friday April 16, 2021 @05:44PM (#26839392)
> It's actively bad for most people for one reason: capacitive mics pick up everything.

This is a myth that's popular with podcasters. If you get as close to a condenser mic as you must with a less-sensitive dynamic mic* and crank down the gain accordingly, you'll find that condenser mics don't magically capture more ambient noise than than dynamic mics.

* Using a fist as a measure, your mouth should be between 1-2 fists away from the mic.

Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by geerlingguy on Friday April 16, 2021 @08:36PM (#26840596)
This is true.

With a good preprocessor (I use a Symetrix I got from an old radio station), I can crank my dynamic mic (EV RE320) to levels that will pick up anything happening in my entire house, with my office door closed.

It's just that the levels from condenser mics tend to be hotter, so by default you hear more stuff in the room unless you get in close and turn it down.

There's no way to replicate the 'radio' sound if you're 2 or 3 ft away from the mic.

Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by geerlingguy on Friday April 16, 2021 @08:34PM (#26840579)
RE20 also has a lower-cost sibling that comes in black, the RE320. Almost identical styling and sound for $100 less.
Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by fumar on Friday April 16, 2021 @11:56AM (#26835508)
I have a yeti and XLR mics and lavalier mics. For ease of use without hassle the Yeti is good but you must use the right setting and account for gain. It picks up a decent amount of ambient sound. That extra noise will muddy your vocals. I’ve gone the route of a simple lavalier setup for most of my video calls and presentations.
Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by CPLX on Friday April 16, 2021 @03:51PM (#26838359)
It's fucking junk, sounds awful.

For what it's worth I'm an audio engineering expert, produced albums, broadcast stuff, and used to review professional studio audio equipment for a living for a national magazine.

People like it because it's simple and it looks cool.

If you want something that has the same basic usability, ie plugs directly into USB and is really easy to use with computer audio, buy the Apogee Mic Plus.

I recently experimented with pretty much everything in this category and was very happy with this model, bought a dozen of them for use in a virtual conference series, where I wanted something I could send to non-technical people who'd never be able to navigate a pro audio interface. I've been very happy with it so far.

Re:A top audio engineer explains NPR’s signature sound (2015) by ZoomZoomZoom on Friday April 16, 2021 @11:40AM (#26835236)
It's ok but absolutely overhyped.