$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just been moved

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by spoonjim on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @03:43PM (#26812068)

This isn't so far fetched. Cash registers already have Internet connections and can be outfitted with cameras to record all bills going in, except maybe those inserted in a stack. And ATMs might already be recording serial numbers of dispensed bills. Essentially they might/could do with currency what they do with license plates, which is track where everything goes and at what times.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by Eduard on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @03:55PM (#26812207)

Like 0 cash registers I have ever seen employ this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by anonporridge on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @04:35PM (#26812709)

Truth is, most cash these days probably only has one or two transactions between bank withdrawal and bank deposit.

If the banks track serial numbers, they could probably build a fairly complete picture of what kind of transactions are going on. With the vast amount of data, you could probably fill in a lot of the gaps.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by deftnerd on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @04:24PM (#26812551)

It's a feature on some money counters, which seem like something banks might use at the end of the day to check the balances in the drawers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by alcover on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @05:10PM (#26813136)

  ATMs might already be recording serial numbers

I've been wondering about this forever.

Say John gets bills from the ATM then pays dealer Dylan for weed. Dylan then buys a beer at a bar.

If Dylan gets convicted, and banks collaborate with the police, then John gets subjected to - at least - parallel reconstruction.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by o-__-o on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @06:38PM (#26813972)

Plausible deniability wrecks that entire thesis (someone existing between John and Dylan such as a gas station)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by alcover on Thursday April 15, 2021 @03:00AM (#26816980)

Gas station isn't someone. It's an endpoint, as the bar in my story. If the gas station cashier takes from the register to get a bier, you're right. If not, my thesis still holds I think.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by miskin on Thursday April 15, 2021 @03:53AM (#26817391)

What if I pay with 100 Euro bank note and get back "tainted" 50 Euro note and then pay in bar? Bank notes are not just collected and sent back to bank.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by alcover on Thursday April 15, 2021 @04:22AM (#26817604)

You're right but the higher the denomination, the smaller the chance it'll serve as change.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:$7.5B In Stolen Bitcoin from 2016 Bitfinex Hack has just ... by o-__-o on Thursday April 15, 2021 @08:25AM (#26819571)

Doesn’t matter, plausible deniability means a reasonable person might spend it. Without knowing who’s next, you may have circumstantial evidence but that’s not enough to hold up in court.

You don’t punish someone based on chance.

[ Parent | on HN ]