Re:What the Dunning-Kruger effect is and isn’t (2010)
by kortilla on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @01:37AM
(#26803305)
Read it again. The comment you are mindlessly bashing is talking about men having more confidence in the ability to learn on the fly, not having more ability to learn on the fly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What the Dunning-Kruger effect is and isn’t (2010)
by colineartheta on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @10:42AM
(#26807735)
I’m not mindlessly bashing anything, I’m speaking up about mindless sexism. You should read it again from the perspective that men and and women are equal, and that “men having more confidence” is a damaging psychology to have (sexist).
Re:What the Dunning-Kruger effect is and isn’t (2010)
by cutemonster on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @12:49PM
(#26809684)
> from the perspective that men and and women are equal
Do you mean "identical"?
I wonder what makes you think that men and women would function precisely the same? (Apart from physical things)
People can be different, but still be equal (as in equality)