Re:In Python, `[0xfor x in (1, 2, 3)]` returns `[15]`
by mywittyname on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @06:32PM
(#26800282)
This showed up on the front page because it's a novelty that even people who have been using the language for over a decade would never encounter.
You're taking my statement way too personally and out of context. You and everyone else can express your opinions all you want.
As a topic in the list of "flaws with Python," I don't think it's a very important or insightful topic because it's not something people really run into. This just doesn't fit there.
This is a novelty, pure and simple. Filed under "weird programming hacks you won't expect" This would be fine. It's like, `([]+![])[+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]][([]+{})]` in javascript. Weird, kind of interesting, but it's not really a "flaw," at least not the sense of something that will burn you unexpectedly.
You're taking my statement way too personally and out of context. You and everyone else can express your opinions all you want.
As a topic in the list of "flaws with Python," I don't think it's a very important or insightful topic because it's not something people really run into. This just doesn't fit there.
This is a novelty, pure and simple. Filed under "weird programming hacks you won't expect" This would be fine. It's like, `([]+![])[+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]][([]+{})]` in javascript. Weird, kind of interesting, but it's not really a "flaw," at least not the sense of something that will burn you unexpectedly.