News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Quantum computing’s reproducibility crisis: Majorana ferm... by d110af5ccf on Monday April 12, 2021 @11:54PM (#26787971)
I agree with the sentiment, but I think "branding" a paper that was rejected in any way whatsoever would make things worse on the whole. The ability to try again seems to be an important part of the (admittedly imperfect) peer review process. (Relevant caricature: http://matt.might.net/articles/peer-fortress)
Re:Quantum computing’s reproducibility crisis: Majorana ferm... by dataflow on Monday April 12, 2021 @11:59PM (#26787993)
Interesting, yeah, I don't know how to solve it. It's a tough problem. (And that link is hilarious and too accurate, thanks.)