I'm well aware of both the colloquial use of practice and "marxist praxis". I was simply implying that, as written, my statement didn't intersect marxism in any way and therefore couldn't have been misunderstood as such without willful misunderstanding.
Note that there are other uses of the word that also themselves don't intersect marxism in any way
>Praxis (from Ancient Greek: πρᾶξις, romanized: praxis) is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, embodied, or realized. "Praxis" may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas.
is exactly what I intended (since I believe pg, and others I was implicating, pontificate but don't do much).
Note that there are other uses of the word that also themselves don't intersect marxism in any way
https://www.ets.org/praxis https://www.luc.edu/socialwork/praxis/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apraxia
Furthermore the precise definition of praxis:
>Praxis (from Ancient Greek: πρᾶξις, romanized: praxis) is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, embodied, or realized. "Praxis" may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas.
is exactly what I intended (since I believe pg, and others I was implicating, pontificate but don't do much).