Re:OpenSearch: AWS fork of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by martinald on Monday April 12, 2021 @01:42PM
(#26782489)
I totally agree, but was stunned to see DigitalOcean charging $0.10/GB for outbound transfer for their new (quite cool imo) apps service. You do get 40GB-100GB included, but it means it's unusable for bandwidth heavy apps. They include 1TB (which is pooled across all VMs) and 0.01/GB on their standard platform.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenSearch: AWS fork of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by GordonS on Monday April 12, 2021 @01:56PM
(#26782710)
Yeah, I think Digital Ocean are really taking the piss there - proven by their existing $0.01/GB pricing, as you mentioned.
I reckon DO have seen the big providers getting away with it, and they want a piece. Why wouldn't they, when there is apparently so little pushback?
Re:OpenSearch: AWS fork of Elasticsearch and Kibana
by martinald on Monday April 12, 2021 @05:19PM
(#26785336)
I suppose you have object storage which is still $0.01/GB (plus includes 1TB to start with), so for most apps your bandwidth will come out of that for most files, so your 0.1/GB price is only for html/api/etc transfer. But still, it's annoying and seems completely arbitatary.