News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s lawyer accidentally made a sensitive document pu... by grumple on Sunday April 11, 2021 @04:14PM (#26773027)
On the other hand, sometimes your Google search can help a doctor in their analysis. An informed patient will get better treatment than an uninformed one; you must be your own healthcare advocate. And for anything nontrivial, this is why second opinions are a must. It would also be interesting if we lived in a world where case complexity and outcomes for doctors and various diagnoses/operations were published as well, so we can see how everyone really holds up competitively.
Re:Google’s lawyer accidentally made a sensitive document pu... by robomartin on Monday April 12, 2021 @12:51PM (#26781750)
> An informed patient will get better treatment than an uninformed one

Absolutely true. Yet that does not turn them into a doctor. The statement I made is very specific.

Personal note: My mother is going through pancreatic cancer at the moment. She is reading everything in sight. Good. Bad. Ugly. She is not intellectually equipped to understand and evaluate it. She is not a doctor.

Well, she is driving her doctors insane. She is refusing certain treatments and asking for bullshit treatments. One doctor has already refused to work with her and asked her to switch to a different doctor. Her current doctor is pretty tired of burning valuable time with this google nonsense.

So, yeah, in general terms, informed individuals --in any field-- are better than the uninformed. The twist, however, is in the meaning of the term "informed".

The internet has created this paradox where millions of people believe they are "informed" or know something, when, in reality, they live in deeper ignorance of facts than before they became "informed" by google and social media.

It's the difference between "Practice makes perfect" (which is a lie) and "Practicing correctly makes perfect".