Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
by Scoundreller on Saturday April 10, 2021 @03:43PM
(#26764444)
... and with much lower commissions than betting on horse/footballer/dog races.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
by nly on Saturday April 10, 2021 @05:34PM
(#26765352)
Depends. There are sports betting platforms outside of the US that work like stock exchanges.
Betting exchanges can offer good liquidity, tight spreads and commissions as low as 2%
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
by jdhzzz on Sunday April 11, 2021 @06:37AM
(#26769267)
I do 99.9% of my gambling in the stock market because it historically is positive sum. Even with costs (commissions, fees, bid/ask spread). For me to win, you don't have to lose. Straight gambling cannot offer this.
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
by gruez on Saturday April 10, 2021 @04:48PM
(#26765001)
Is it? Robinhood allows you to trade for free, but that's not the whole story. Bid-ask spreads add an implicit fee to each transaction. This is small for highly liquid stocks, but buying blue chip stocks directly also isn't exactly exciting. If you want the excitement of gambling you'd need to either use margin (borrowing fees) or options (worse spread).
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading
by hogFeast on Saturday April 10, 2021 @06:56PM
(#26766028)
If you bet on a liquid market, you will pay vig of something like 1-2%. Where I am, it is actually cheaper to bet (just think about how unbelievably fucked that is...you can see why VCs want to insert themselves into that) but in the US your trade costs are probably underneath that level all-in.