>Not even electromagnetism is a single formula
"dF = 0" represents all of Maxwell's (homogeneous) equations in terms of "differential forms".
With the right pattern recognition, the right definitions, and the right paradigm shift, you can compress multiple equations into a single equation.
Re:Hawking Hawking
by TheOtherHobbes on Friday April 09, 2021 @01:20PM
(#26753259)
With the right assumptions, ignoring not a few significant details, to a useful order of precision, as long as you don't look too hard.
Maxwell's equations are a nice continuous approximation to whatever it is that really happens.
But it's not a good idea to confuse the map with the territory.
This is more akin to lossless compression than the transcription of a territory onto a map.
A single formula is entirely possible. Simple rules in principle can generate the complexity of the universe we see. Look into the Wolfram Science Project to see how.
Re:Hawking Hawking
by pierrefermat1 on Friday April 09, 2021 @05:07AM
(#26748299)
Yes and all of his CA's are at least 3 conditional statements, but if you're inclined to count that as one formula with split definitions then anything can be bashed into "a single formula"
Re:Hawking Hawking
by raverbashing on Friday April 09, 2021 @05:12AM
(#26748332)
> Look into the Wolfram Science Project
Ah yes that "theory" that ignores the complexity and quirks of reality
No, this is ridiculous. Not even electromagnetism is a single formula
Expecting we end up with "a single formula" is a ridiculous strawman.
What we need is explain GR with a foundation in QM (or with a common base, which might - but probably won't - be String Theory)