News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A “deepfake” is at the center of a harassment case, but w... by jjk166 on Thursday April 08, 2021 @04:37PM (#26743472)
> The statement is similar to claims made by Engelhart to the Daily Dot that Spone allegedly used legitimate video as a basis for the deepfake. Police did not know whether the alleged victim’s face was added to a video of another young female vaping or if a vaping pen and smoke was digitally added to a legitimate video of the alleged victim.

> Weintraub also stated during the press conference that investigators determined that the vaping video had been manipulated after analyzing its “metadata,” a term which refers to embedded information in digital media that can reveal how and when it was last edited.

> But after contacting Reiss, the officer who investigated Spone, the Daily Dot learned that police never actually obtained the original vaping video. Instead, like what was seen on NBC News, police only had access to a cellphone recording taken by Spone of the vaping video being played on a separate device. Any metadata analysis would therefore fail to include information on the source video.

It appears the police are calling the video of the vaping a deepfake

Re:A “deepfake” is at the center of a harassment case, but w... by nightpool on Thursday April 08, 2021 @04:45PM (#26743545)
My mistake! I had hedged around that point in my original comment, but I removed it after reading the twitter thread DailyDot where HenryAjder seemed to imply the opposite. I've updated my comment to clarify