Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by jandrese on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:01PM
(#26742435)
That one felt a bit contrived since it's highlighting an comment that has been downvoted almost to oblivion. The low contrast is a warning that the content is probably not worth your time. The low contrast is a feature, not a bug.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by mcguire on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:47PM
(#26742933)
Is it? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2222522
That's the text of a text post. The same issue can be seen here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26739220
Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by detaro on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:50PM
(#26742961)
I believe it's still a "feature" in the sense that HN wants to discourage text submissions, but I think it's very arguable if this a good way of doing it.
Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by alfu on Thursday April 08, 2021 @04:06PM
(#26743133)
I only read the comments anyway.
Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by jandrese on Thursday April 08, 2021 @04:57PM
(#26743668)
Oh, then that is weird. I have no idea.
Re:Contrast Rebellion – to hell with unreadable, low-contras...
by the_af on Thursday April 08, 2021 @03:53PM
(#26742994)
No, it's the initial submission, not a comment.
This also confuses the hell out of me, I always "read" them as "heavily downvoted comment" only to realize "hey, no, that's a question! Why does HN style it like that?".
Every time.