Re:AMD and Xilinx Stockholders Overwhelmingly Approve AMD’s ...
by wu_187 on Thursday April 08, 2021 @07:05AM
(#26737313)
amd64 isn't going away any time soon. Intel is still the largest player here. If I were Intel right now, I'd be trying to come up with the next iteration of x86, probably 256 bit.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AMD and Xilinx Stockholders Overwhelmingly Approve AMD’s ...
by colejohnson66 on Thursday April 08, 2021 @01:28PM
(#26741472)
There don’t seem to be many advantages to words larger that 64 IMO (they do exist, but things like GMP exist for that). If the purpose would be parallel processing (a la SIMD), we already have “256 bit x86” with AVX2. IIRC, Intel’s x86 chips can process 256 bits of integer data at the same time. And if you want 512 bits, AVX-512 exists as well (but it’s implemented internally as two sequences of 256 bit data)
Re:AMD and Xilinx Stockholders Overwhelmingly Approve AMD’s ...
by enragedcacti on Thursday April 08, 2021 @09:18AM
(#26738323)
> 256 bit
but, why? do we need more than 16 exabytes of memory?
Re:AMD and Xilinx Stockholders Overwhelmingly Approve AMD’s ...
by colejohnson66 on Thursday April 08, 2021 @01:30PM
(#26741512)
Right. Does anyone even need a megabyte? As Bill Gates famously (didn’t) say, “640k ought to be enough for anybody”.
Joking aside, we very well may one day have more memory available that 64 address lines can handle. RISC-V’s spec does have a stub chapter for “RV128”