Re:IBM COBOL for Linux on x86
by ChuckMcM on Thursday April 08, 2021 @01:11AM
(#26735290)
Running VAX binaries per-se isn't a problem, you can run them on SIMH quite reasonably[1]. The challenge is running VAX binaries that use authorization keys (PAKs). Unless you have the key (or forge one) the binary won't run.
I have keys for the VAX assembler (and Fortran, BASIC, and Ada) so running source, and building applications that DECUS distributed back in the day, isn't a problem for me.
What annoyed me was that VMS/VAX support was discontinued by the hobbyiest program. When it was announced and I asked for details they suggested I contact licensing. Which I did and suggested I could buy new licenses for VAX machines for $5,000 good for up to 25 users. For a machine that was headed for the skip. So someone, somewhere, and I'm thinking US GOV here, "can't" upgrade their VAX hardware and HP has them over a barrel so they continue to hold those licenses as saleable products. But that is purely speculation on my part.
[1] In fact, for the earlier models (anything before the VAX 4000 series), they run faster on a modern PC under simh than they do on the original hardware.
I have keys for the VAX assembler (and Fortran, BASIC, and Ada) so running source, and building applications that DECUS distributed back in the day, isn't a problem for me.
What annoyed me was that VMS/VAX support was discontinued by the hobbyiest program. When it was announced and I asked for details they suggested I contact licensing. Which I did and suggested I could buy new licenses for VAX machines for $5,000 good for up to 25 users. For a machine that was headed for the skip. So someone, somewhere, and I'm thinking US GOV here, "can't" upgrade their VAX hardware and HP has them over a barrel so they continue to hold those licenses as saleable products. But that is purely speculation on my part.
[1] In fact, for the earlier models (anything before the VAX 4000 series), they run faster on a modern PC under simh than they do on the original hardware.