We should talk about those things in public - and not everyone will agree. That's how it's supposed to be.

It's brand new, however, to wield the power to literally cut off your political enemies from more than half of the population with a single click of the mouse.

Also this article states that Twitch that the misconduct is this:

"It said examples of this “severe misconduct” include terrorist activities, child sexual exploitation, violent extremism, credible threats of mass violence, carrying out or deliberately acting as an accomplice to sexual assault and threatening Twitch or its staff."

Which one of these are just political opinions?

And a private school "banning" a book isn't an actual ban. You could still purchase and read the book if you desired.

But Twitch can't?

Was it wrong for a private school to "ban" a book? I think so... do you?

Do you think it's wrong for twitch to ban people for: "terrorist activities, child sexual exploitation, violent extremism, credible threats of mass violence, carrying out or deliberately acting as an accomplice to sexual assault and threatening Twitch or its staff."?

Banning a book isn't even in the same ball park. I think it's pathetic of the school.

There was an Atari 2600 game that involved rape which was banned in some community on Long Island. That's the only one i can think of.

Indeed. The remedy here is to enforce anti-trust laws.