Re:Et Tu, Signal?
by xenocratus on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @11:54AM
(#26726718)
So you're saying we should have the same standard while literally giving two different types of allegations that are thrown at Signal and Telegram respectively?
We either consider the funding of both and decide how the funding COULD ultimately impact the product, or we could look at the source code of the applications and the cryptographic theory supporting them and talk about that. If crypto experts aren't finding holes in Signal's protocols [1], I don't think random people on the internet yelling "bUt It WaS fUnDeD bY ..." will make it less secure.
We either consider the funding of both and decide how the funding COULD ultimately impact the product, or we could look at the source code of the applications and the cryptographic theory supporting them and talk about that. If crypto experts aren't finding holes in Signal's protocols [1], I don't think random people on the internet yelling "bUt It WaS fUnDeD bY ..." will make it less secure.
[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1013