Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by ShroudedNight on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @05:44PM
(#26717746)
This sounds like a dangerous assumption to make. I would expect that needing 25% more machines for the same performance would be a non-starter for many potential customers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by rbanffy on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @07:05PM
(#26718477)
If they still cost the same in the end, it’s still a tie. If you manage 100,000 machines, managing 125,000 is not a huge leap.
Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by throwaway888abc on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @11:02PM
(#26720131)
Well, potentially 25000 machines more to fix