News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Netflix Made Record Profits in 2020, Paid a Tax Rate of L... by Retric on Monday April 05, 2021 @09:14PM (#26706880)
Now you buy something for $100,000, say construction of a building, that building falls apart and breaks down after 39 years, it was not sold.

The day it falls down it stops being useful, the day before that you have full use and therefore value of the building.

Or as I said several posts ago: “The general rule is something is a deductible expense at the point of destruction or sale not purchase.” Sure, it burned in a fire fine assuming you don’t have insurance then it’s a loss at that point.

Really equipment is generally binary either it works or it’s broken, unless you’re selling it then it’s exactly as useful on day 2854 as 2855. Worse, well maintained equipment lasts far beyond the accelerated depreciation benchmarks used. Anything not thrown away the day it’s theoretical value hit’s zero is unambiguously a subsidy, but so is anything with scrap value etc. But, as I clearly demonstrated the idea of depreciation it’s self was created as a subsidy.

> Accelerated depreciation means you pay less tax and have more money at the start of a project when it is needed and pay more to the government later when it has stabilized.

People say stuff like this, yet hopefully suggesting the government hands out zero interest loans to group X raises red flags. Depreciation is a subsidy in effect a zero interest loan and that in and of it’s self is a problem. Opportunity cost is a huge deal and trying to ignore that is why central planning fails.

Re:Netflix Made Record Profits in 2020, Paid a Tax Rate of L... by smaryjerry on Monday April 05, 2021 @10:52PM (#26707484)
And who decides when it has “stopped working.” It is standardized to 39 years because it is impossible to prove for every single item individually and people would then be incentivized to not take care of their possessions so they can finally deduct it. This is all besides my original point which is that accelerated depreciation is a big factor in determining whether projects occur, the opposite of the article. You yourself are calling it a subsidy and a loan, and so even if your reasoning is wrong, would agree with me that it is something that helps make a project feasible. So all this arguing is just you trying to argue. Get your CPA and talk to me again.
Re:Netflix Made Record Profits in 2020, Paid a Tax Rate of L... by Retric on Monday April 05, 2021 @11:03PM (#26707545)
> And who decides when it has “stopped working.”

Initially the company, though audits and penalties help keep them honest.

> accelerated depreciation is a big factor in determining whether projects occur

And clearly that’s a problem. Just as government farm subsidies waste money growing excess food accelerated depreciation causes significant economic waste.

> CPA

Ahh, there’s your problem a CPA has nothing to do with economic issues. This is an economic and thus a policy issue but you’re trying to argue based on the existing law rather than the underlying reality. I don’t expect you to get a in depth education on the topic, but if you’re interested I can recommended some good books to get you started.

But to summarize a huge body of work, the broken window fallacy demonstrates that economic activity isn’t inherently beneficial. Maximum efficiency isn’t equivalent to maximum GDP etc. As such policies that increase economic activity can be and generally are detrimental.

Re:Netflix Made Record Profits in 2020, Paid a Tax Rate of L... by smaryjerry on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @02:37AM (#26708695)
Didn’t read, I’m not here to teach you accounting.
Re:Netflix Made Record Profits in 2020, Paid a Tax Rate of L... by Retric on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @07:15AM (#26710489)
Sure, I point out being a CPA is meaningless here and you get really defensive. Grow up and you might break 200 karma before 2022.