Re:One woman's struggle to remove all traces of videotaped s...
by brayhite on Monday April 05, 2021 @06:21PM
(#26705399)
And all those tourists in the background of your selfie at the Statue of Liberty. Need their permission, too?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:One woman's struggle to remove all traces of videotaped s...
by toomuchtodo on Monday April 05, 2021 @06:29PM
(#26705461)
If it’s out in public and non commercial, no. If commercial, a release form is required. Assumes US law as-is today.
https://www.format.com/magazine/resources/photography/photo-...
Re:One woman's struggle to remove all traces of videotaped s...
by PhasmaFelis on Monday April 05, 2021 @06:33PM
(#26705505)
Your link says:
"If someone is in a public space, like a park, beach, or sidewalk, it is legal to photograph them. They shouldn’t expect privacy laws to prevent them from being photographed. That means a street photographer can publish candids taken in public spaces, as long as those images are only being used for editorial purposes."
It'd be impossible to photograph a protest, rally, sporting event, or basically any long shot of a public area if you had to get individual consent from every person in the frame.
Re:One woman's struggle to remove all traces of videotaped s...
by kbenson on Monday April 05, 2021 @07:15PM
(#26705891)
I suspect there's a bit of nuance there which hasn't been identified here yet. Perhaps to do with whether people are background or immediately identifiable, or and active part of of what's going on. I know consent forms are a part of television recording when talking to people on the street (otherwise they blur faces), but I don't think they bother to get everyone in the background to sign.