Re:Cheyenne Web Server
by rufugee on Sunday June 19, 2011 @11:01AM
(#2670945)
I've always felt the potential of the language and community was a missed opportunity because of the refusal to open source it. Languages like rebol thrive when they are set free. It's a shame really.
Re:Cheyenne Web Server
by sambeau on Sunday June 19, 2011 @12:04PM
(#2671075)
I totally agree. I think that Carl is just a little old-school to fully open it. Walter Bright of 'D' had similar problems that limited the initial take-up of the language.
Its a shame really as I imagine many net hackers would love Rebol, especially those with a penchant for Lisp and lisp-a-likes.
Re:Cheyenne Web Server
by getsat on Sunday June 19, 2011 @08:30AM
(#2670748)
Haha. I think Apache is the only popular webserver nowadays that actually still can't beat the C10k problem [1] without an extravagant amount of system resources. Process- and thread-based concurrency sucks for HTTP(S).
Also, it's creator Carl Sassenrath wrote the Amiga Computer operating system kernel, the first preemptive multitasking system on a home computer.
http://www.rebol.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sassenrath
Its a shame really as I imagine many net hackers would love Rebol, especially those with a penchant for Lisp and lisp-a-likes.
Event-driven is the way to go.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C10k_problem
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.3/mod/event.html