Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides
by ehmmmmmmmm on Monday April 05, 2021 @12:55PM
(#26701478)
Again, the law doesn't precede science, and doesn't change the fact that it's going to be life-threatening.
You can quote the law all you want, but if you're blind and someone with PTSD is driving (and because they don't have much of a choice job-wise) you're going to be in grave danger.
If you don't want to be in grave danger, speak out against this law. End of story.
Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides
by NullPrefix on Monday April 05, 2021 @01:03PM
(#26701601)
>because they don't have much of a choice job-wise
That is not an excuse to put other people in grave danger
>End of story.
> Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals.