Re:Amazon illegally fired activist workers, Labor Board finds
by monocasa on Monday April 05, 2021 @10:06AM
(#26699124)
Why does a journalist institution have to go above printing Amazon's statements on the matter, and print their now disproven legal theories as well?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon illegally fired activist workers, Labor Board finds
by SpicyLemonZest on Monday April 05, 2021 @11:29AM
(#26700328)
It’s not an endorsement, it’s information. As a reader, I want to know which legal theories specifically were disproven. For example, would my own employer’s “no public statements” policy be invalid based on this ruling, or was the problem something specific to Amazon?