Re:The alternative Internet, WiFi based
by runjake on Saturday June 18, 2011 @02:52PM
(#2669244)
I don't mean to be insulting, but this looks like it was hatched up by a high school teenager with no experience or skills in setting up metropolitan-scale networks, let alone a "second" Internet.
No security, & contrary to the webpage's claims completely touchable and jammable. Unless you had a ridiculous amount of wireless access points deployed, destroying one node would have a significant effect (again, contrary to what the webpage sees).
Re:The alternative Internet, WiFi based
by jamer on Sunday June 19, 2011 @01:18PM
(#2671249)
Actually, I'm not sure why the website doesn't mention that, but we were aware of that. Our lack of experience in security was one of the factors in why we didn't continue further.
No security, & contrary to the webpage's claims completely touchable and jammable. Unless you had a ridiculous amount of wireless access points deployed, destroying one node would have a significant effect (again, contrary to what the webpage sees).