Re:A CO2 capture solvent with exceptionally low total costs ...
by danmaz74 on Sunday April 04, 2021 @11:28AM
(#26690200)
How many billion people would need to die to make that sustainable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A CO2 capture solvent with exceptionally low total costs ...
by aardvarkr on Sunday April 04, 2021 @11:38AM
(#26690284)
This sounds like hyperbole but itβs the honest truth. Billions would die due to food shortages. Our modern farming system is incredible at its job of feeding 7 billion people.
Re:A CO2 capture solvent with exceptionally low total costs ...
by dagss on Sunday April 04, 2021 @01:33PM
(#26691321)
...and yet 1/3rd of the food is thrown away/perish globally.
There is a lot of excessive waste / inefficiencies due to energy being -- relatively -- cheap.
If energy prices soar, many inefficiencies will get more attention. Like, if food becomes more expensive we would stop throwing away 1/3 of it. (And more houses would get proper insulation. And so on.)
Re:A CO2 capture solvent with exceptionally low total costs ...
by iggldiggl on Monday April 05, 2021 @01:43PM
(#26702069)
At least part of which is a necessary hedge against possible years with a bad harvest, though. A temporary shortage of toilet paper or even microchips is one thing, but you most certainly wouldn't want the same thing to happen with your food supply.