Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today?

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by marcodiego on Saturday April 03, 2021 @10:23AM (#26681311)

Nice! Still compiles with a minor modification: added a break on the default case of a switch. Time signature is wrong when playing though.

Edit: Fixed: add "frequency = frequency/2;" after the comment /* Set the output frequency */ in file audioIO_Linux.c

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by ddingus on Saturday April 03, 2021 @11:26AM (#26681793)

Cool! I liked the quality output of that player at the time. Highs were clean.

Does it still hold up?

Maybe I will build it just for grins myself. Thanks for the tips.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by marcodiego on Saturday April 03, 2021 @11:57AM (#26682035)

I can't critically evaluate the quality since I have no high quality mp3 nor Hi-Fi audio devices. An old recording of mine http://marcodiegomesquita.tripod.com/rda.mp3 sounded with very unsaturated bass; which is good, I think I recorded/mastered it wrongly or the software I used at the time decoded it like amp decodes it. It actually sounds really good with amp.

But yes, it uses very little cpu. Maybe less than dosamp.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by ddingus on Saturday April 03, 2021 @12:19PM (#26682232)

I had similar experiences. Yeah, I need to build it now. Have a few tracks that often have watery highs, just not crisp. Amp played them great.

Maybe I will play your track after the family activities. Edit: Except access denied, lol. No worries.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by marcodiego on Saturday April 03, 2021 @01:00PM (#26682647)

Hugh of death likely. I can download it correctly from here: https://marcodiegomesquita.tripod.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by ddingus on Saturday April 03, 2021 @07:19PM (#26685609)

Cool, thanks.

[ Parent | on HN ]