Re:Nuclear should be considered part of clean energy standar...
by imtringued on Saturday April 03, 2021 @03:33AM
(#26679016)
That's incredibly stupid. Do you really want to waste your budget on expensive disaster cleanup of a single nuclear power plant? If you decommission old nuclear power plants you save the 200 billion needed to clean them up in an accident (think of Fukushima). That money could have been used to build 5 modern power plants and do a non disaster cleanup of the old power plant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nuclear should be considered part of clean energy standar...
by andrewlgood on Saturday April 03, 2021 @05:09PM
(#26684763)
You don't waste your budget on either. You build solar/wind with natural gas combined cycles. Then you shut down the existing nuclear plant that is hemorrhaging cash and never build the new nuclear. The only new nuclear power plant under construction in the US is Georgia Power's Vogtle 3/4. As described above it is incredibly over budget. What investor would seek to try again? It is not like we build 1,000 of these a year and the industry get more adept. We are building 2 units over 10 years.