News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by everdrive on Friday April 02, 2021 @09:14PM (#26677582)
Thank you sir. My windows 95 machine could not play an MP3, and I could hardly download one in my dialup connection. My entire hard drive was 500mb, and I couldn’t have saved many MP3s even if I’d wanted. I did have about 1000 MIDI files, though.
Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by virtue3 on Friday April 02, 2021 @09:17PM (#26677613)
They were compressed to shit back then. Like 96kbps bitrate or something. (way before variable bitrate was a thing).

I remember them being like 1.5-3 mb each. Not that bad of a download with a 56k

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by cogman10 on Friday April 02, 2021 @09:37PM (#26677707)
Ah yes, I remember when a 1MB download took 30 minutes to 1 hour to complete.

Now I don't even blink over hitting a webpage with multiple megs of assets.

The hacker news favicon is bigger than most webpages of the time :D

Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by everdrive on Friday April 02, 2021 @10:05PM (#26677869)
I had a 56k modem, but in practice, I could seldom get 3kbps. Just a bit too rural. 2 - 2.5 was usually what I got.
Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by Edman274 on Saturday April 03, 2021 @02:48AM (#26678858)
I have a hunch that you're mixing up bits and bytes in that memory, because I very distinctly remember seeing the internet explorer 4 download progress indicator telling me that I was getting 4.5 "KBPS" down on a 48K link, which makes sense when you convert kilobits per second to kilobytes per second. Internet Explorer would give download speeds in kilobytes per second. If you were getting 3 kilobytes per second, then that's equivalent to ~28.8 kilobits per second, which my buddy who lived out in the middle of nowhere would get. He would come to my house in town so he could get better performance in Runescape. This was in 2003. I am not joking.
Re:Windows 95 – How Does It Look Today? by everdrive on Saturday April 03, 2021 @02:55PM (#26683671)
You have the right idea -- I wasn't mixing them up, but as you note, I expected to be able to get more than 3KBPS on a 56.6k link. I still managed to download about 3,000 songs on that link, though! I was very dedicated. I couldn't actually browse the internet while downloading, so I had to queue up webpages, or just find something else to do while I downloaded a single song.