It shouldn't distress you. I am one person (of unknown quality) but I have found the comments to be perfectly fine. Aside from the pedantic arguments (universal versus guaranteed) which offer no viewpoint of the policy, every commenter wants to improve the lives of their poor, black and brown neighbors. They just also want to improve the lives of their poor, white neighbors as well.
Is it so bad a thing to want to extend a good thing (which you support) to include more people? Isn't that the definition of inclusivity? Should it matter if a statistical measure (the racial wealth gap) changes more slowly so long as more people get the chance to live a dignified life?
Edit: I want to clarify I'm not asking these questions rhetorically. I genuinely want to understand your perspective.
1) White flight take jobs and money out of the area, into towns and cities over the hills, and also into more affluent parts of the city 2) "Redevelopment" carves up the neighborhood: hwy 980 isolates West Oakland from downtown; 880 (former Cyprus Freeway) slices the neighborhood in half; BART lops off an additional portion near the port. (I can't emphasize how badly this messed up the neighborhood.) 3) The Black Panthers started a few blocks from here, on Peralta Street, as a way for the residents to defend themselves from police abuse and empower the community; they are all but destroyed by the Feds' COINTELPRO. 4) Not specific to the neighborhood, still The War on Drugs is worth mentioning. Need I say more about that?
These things that happened a generation or two ago, they still resonate down through to the present in this community. I see it outside my window: my black and brown neighbors scrape to get by. This UBI program isn't supposed to fix it all, it's just a small step in the direction of balance.