News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by inopinatus on Thursday April 01, 2021 @08:35PM (#26667983)
Here’s a fun fact for you. When I talk to my wife, and she tells me things about work, I don’t say “citation needed”; nor would I change that in response to whinging demands from the peanut gallery, and doubly not as followup from that of a comment/opinion/anecdote-driven website as riddled with bad-faith weasels as this one.

Which is, of course, in part, why I’m still married.

Alternatively, for a related experience, since you're on rotation, try going up to your CMO and demanding evidence for some off-the-cuff remark they've made about their own professional choices. Good luck.

Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by disabled on Friday April 02, 2021 @04:35PM (#26675692)
Thanks for calling me a “bad faith weasel”, LOL. BTW, I upvoted you for your sense of humor.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by inopinatus on Saturday April 03, 2021 @03:21AM (#26678973)
Oh, it was another, far more vitriolic correspondent I had particularly in mind with that epithet, but thanks.
[dead]
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by inopinatus on Friday April 02, 2021 @04:09AM (#26669838)
Adding personal invective to your litany of misquotations, misrepresentations, straw-man arguments, and sealioning, as in comments passim, is not an inducement to further discussion.