News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by vkou on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @06:18PM (#26653838)
A bad tweet is obvious because it's easy to digest.

Unfortunately, the 'dislike' signal on a YouTube video doesn't tell me if it's because an expert disagrees with its content, or because the creator is being brigaded, or because the downvoters disagree with their politics (related or unrelated).

The comments are a better signal, but looking through them requires reading... YouTube comments.

Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by Waterluvian on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @06:24PM (#26653910)
I'm not sure bad videos are any harder to digest than bad tweets. Maybe a bit more time consuming?
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by hnick on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @06:48PM (#26654142)
Yes, if I am trying to fix my dishwasher and I see a video with a high dislike ratio I will move on because at best it's probably a time waster and at worst dangerous.

My options now would be to spend a minute or two watching it or reading the comments (engagement!), which may not exist on some niche videos you run across for things like this. This adds up when browsing. Don't forget creators can disable comments too.

Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by filoleg on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:08PM (#26654346)
> My options now would be to spend a minute or two watching it or reading the comments

Fully agreed with you on everything you said here, but that specific line I quoted sounds a bit optimistic to me.

You would only waste a minute or two if the video author decided to actually start his video "for real" from the very beginning, instead of spending the first few minutes on his entire life story (that is not even related to the video content) and asking people to like and subscribe. It became so commonplace, these days I instantly start liking videos just for not wasting the first few minutes on things completely irrelevant to the actual content (which would be somewhat fine for entertainment videos, but definitely not for things like DYI tutorials and lessons).

Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by hnick on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:16PM (#26654427)
For instructional videos I usually click through to skim before fully committing, especially if they waffle at the start. It works easier on desktop than mobile though.

And don't forget the Wadsworth Constant :)

https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/the-wadsworth-const...

Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by fuzxi on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @10:43PM (#26656075)
I'm not sure if it still works, but you used to be able to append something like '&wadsworth' to the end of youtube links and it would act like a timestamp link 30% of the way through the video.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by hnick on Thursday April 01, 2021 @03:20AM (#26657514)
I think it was &wadsworth=1 and no they removed the fun :(
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by Waterluvian on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:02PM (#26654283)
Just pick the video with a lot of upvotes that has a good title card and is early on in the search results.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl... by hnick on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:17PM (#26654442)
I'm pretty sure this is how you teach YouTube that you like clickbait.

But I guess that happens anyway.