Re:Inside a viral website
by VBprogrammer on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:42AM
(#26648682)
In the article he mentioned this; he was worried about the hosting costs. Thankfully his host got a laugh out of it and donated the hosting cost and he has in turn donated any proceeds.
Re:Inside a viral website
by iamacyborg on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:48AM
(#26648758)
Right, but if you're incurring significant hosting costs for a static site in 2021 then you're doing something wrong.
Re:Inside a viral website
by tomjohnneill on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @04:11PM
(#26652470)
In hindsight, you're right. And obviously I didn't. However at the time, it was the uncertainty as a result of never having done something like this that made me worried.
Re:Inside a viral website
by FalconSensei on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @03:45PM
(#26652149)
unless you have images?
Cloudflare Pages[0] claims to have unlimited bandwidth, even for their free tier.
Hosting costs money. Although for someone who's go-to stack for a meme website is NextJS + React could probably afford to fork over $70 for 15 minutes of Internet fame.
Re:Inside a viral website
by iamacyborg on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @05:43PM
(#26653523)
Hosting costs pennies (if even that) if you’re just serving static html content.
Re:Inside a viral website
by ampdepolymerase on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @01:39PM
(#26650357)
If you can build a PaaS around it like Giphy and sell user data, sure.
Re:Inside a viral website
by iamacyborg on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @01:57PM
(#26650640)
Yeah but Giphy's a full on product, not just a static single page site.
That sort of feels like the core issue. Why even try to monetise a page like this?